AnswerTips enabled

 

 

CEO Severance Packages

By: Jim Taylor

Companies I wouldn’t mind not working for

When I was growing up, my generation generally looked for a job where progressive promotions would enable us to retire comfortably.

        We got it wrong! Today, it seems, it’s much more profitable not to work for some companies.

        Case in point – Henry Silverman, former CEO of Cendant Corp. He left with a severance package worth more than $110 million.

        Before he got fired, he got a salary reported at $1.9 million a year.

        So Cendant effectively pays him not to work for them for 55 years.

        Silverman built Cendant into an industrial conglomerate that included car rental company Avis, hotel chain Ramada, Orbitz on-line travel, Century 21 and Coldwell Banker real estate, and Sotheby’s International.

        “This was an executive … valued for his deal-making prowess,” explained Patrick McGurn, executive vice-president for Institutional Shareholder Services. “He was paid for putting all these deals together. Now he’s getting paid for taking them apart.”

        Avis paid Silverman $62.5 million for selling them off. Realogy, the real estate spinoff, will contribute another $50 million. Orbitz and Ramada have yet to be heard from.


Severance packages

        I’d like to offer my services to some companies I wouldn’t mind not working for.

        When Edward E. Whitacre Jr., 65, retires from AT&T, he can expect about $84.7 million in retirement benefits plus $73.8 million in deferred pay – over $158 million.

        At Occidental Petroleum, chief executive Ray R. Irani has socked away some $124 million in his deferred compensation account. Last year, that account earned $679,396 in interest. Equilar, a research firm that specializes in executive salaries, estimated his interest alone at 14 times the average salary of an oil-industry worker.

        Increasingly, senior executives negotiate severance packages before they sign on.

        Employee benefits corporation Cigna would give H. Edward Hanway between $72.8 million and $80.5 million if he voluntarily stepped down after any sale of the company.

        Johnson & Johnson will pay William C. Weldon $64.2 million. IBM will pay Samuel J. Palmisano $54.6 million. And Ford’s Alan Mullaly will get $28 million if he leaves for any reason other than committing a crime.

        Even these settlements pale against the retirement package for Lee Raymond, CEO of Exxon, worth nearly $400 million. His salary, for his last year of work, was almost $60,000 an hour.


Nardelli numbers

        Don’t tell me that these figures compare to the incomes of sports and movie superstars. Julia Roberts doesn’t get paid not to act, or Nellie Furtado not to sing. Tiger Woods and Steve Nash get paid only if they play.

        And don’t tell me that corporate CEOs deserve this income because they’re responsible for the welfare of thousands of employees. Tell the thousands of Nortel staff who got laid off. Tell the Enron employees bilked out of their pensions.

        Some severance settlements are theoretical. Merrill Lynch’s chief executive, E. Stanley O’Neal, could receive $251.4 million if a merger results in something called “a change-in-control payout.”

        Home Depot lured CEO Robert Nardelli away from GE by promising take-home cash and bonuses worth $82 million if he were dismissed. He would receive a cash payment of $20 million within his first 30 days of unemployment.

        It sure beats going on going on the dole.

        Some consultants now call the value of potential severance and change-in-control payouts the “Nardelli Number.”

        The only time I got eased out of a job, my boss gave me three months pay and relocation counselling.

        He didn’t offer “non-compete” compensation, and I didn’t know enough to ask for it.

        Non-compete clauses – when I disentangle the legal jargon – lie at the heart of the case against Conrad Black. The prosecution alleges that Black and his friends pocketed some $50 million in “non-compete” fees that should have gone to shareholders of Hollinger International.


Growing disparities

        If these figures make your eyes glaze and your stomach turn, you’re not alone. Fellow columnist and military ethicist Arthur Gans called them “obscene.”

        Gans was referring specifically to the growing disparity between CEO and worker incomes.

        The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives calculated that by 9:46 a.m. on January 2, Canada’s 100 highest-paid corporate executives had already received as much as an average Canadian worker would earn in the entire year—$38,010.

        In his best-selling book Collapse, Jared Diamond analyzed the causes of the sudden and precipitous collapse of past and present civilizations.

        He identified five factors—environmental degradation, climate change, war, trade, and the society’s own internal response to these challenges.

        Not every collapse involved all five factors.
Easter Island, for instance, had no external enemies or trade.

        But every collapse shared one common factor. The leadership got out of touch with the people.

        In every case, the people at the top acquired more lands, more wealth, more luxury… while their people sank progressively further into poverty.

        Sources as diverse as The Economist magazine, the OECD, and the Council of Economic Advisors all agree that the poorest 20 per cent of the
U.S. population saw their real income decline by a third over two decades.

        Using Federal Reserve data, Commonweal magazine calculated that in 1974, corporate CEOs earned 35 times as much as their average worker. By 1995, they earned 150 times as much.


Excessive variances

        And some go far beyond that.

        Last year, Occidental’s Irani received a salary of $52.1 million. About 1000 times his average employee’s.

        That’s only what Occidental officially paid him. Buried in fine print, on page 28, the proxy statement required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act showed that in 2006 Irani also cashed out $270.1 million in profit from stock options. And he withdrew another $93.3 million from a deferred stock plan revealed for the first time.

        Total take – 8,594 times his average worker’s salary.

        “Out of touch” seems like an understatement.

        If Diamond is right, the increasing disconnect between rich and poor (economists call it the gini ratio) bodes ill for the future of western civilization, and for welfare of human society generally.

 

*****************************************
Copyright © 2007 by Jim Taylor. Non-profit use in congregations and study groups permitted; all other rights reserved.
*****************************************