
By: Jim Taylor
Logging
companies and municipalities square off
This week saw two major organizations—B.C.’s
forest industry and its municipal governments—closely watching a meaningless
court hearing in Vancouver.
It was meaningless
because—well, first I need to fill in some background.
Under B.C.’s somewhat
convoluted system of government, municipalities are responsible for such
matters as the purity of their water supply. But the provincial government
retains authority over industrial activities.
Along B.C.’s
Western Forest Products has a
provincial licence to log that watershed.
It’s not a large logging operation—a
47-hectare patch in a 7,300 hectare watershed.
But logging has caused problems
for water systems elsewhere.
Across the province, there are
more than 200 boil-water advisories, many because of turbidity.
Forcing the issue
Regional districts cannot regulate logging beyond their
boundaries. But health boards can.
So the regional district used a
provision of the B.C. Health Act to constitute itself as a health board.
It ordered Western Forest Products to stop work on slopes greater than 60
degrees. It also halved the amount of rainfall permitted before the company had
to halt any road-building.
The order, as I read it, would
have had limited effect on WFP’s
operations. It permitted them to remove trees already cut or prepared for
removal by helicopter. B.C.’s Forest Practices Code already regulates
logging next to creeks.
And a 60 degree slope? During
my brief career in forestry, the professional forester in charge treated 60
degrees as inaccessible. A 60-degree slope rises two
meters for every meter forward. It is, for all practical purposes, a cliff.
But Western Forest Products
immediately stopped all work, and appealed the legality of the ruling to the
B.C. Supreme Court. In the meantime, the company asked the court to stay the
district’s order.
WFP claimed economic urgency.
Their licence requires them to harvest $2 million
worth of timber by April 2008, or face stiff fines.
But they could have continued
logging anyway. So money is not the point.
The precedent is. If they
meekly complied, they might set a precedent that would permit local governments
to regulate any activity in their watersheds.
Different issue, same
problem
Here in
So far, those habitations have
not noticeably affected the quality of our drinking water. But when happens
when there are more?
The cottage owners have formed
an association to lobby for getting their leases converted into full ownership.
Again, two levels of government
have different priorities.
As population in the valley
grows,
“Twenty or 30 years from now,”
asks Water Manager Jack Allingham, “will we have to
buy back those properties?”
Currently, only Vancouver and
Victoria fully control their water sources.
Smaller communities lack such
protection. If
So smaller
municipalities must plead with an often unresponsive provincial government.
Legal shadow boxing
Western
Forest Products applied to the court for a stay on Wednesday. It was granted on
Friday.
Justice Bruce Butler allowed
Western Forest Products to continue road-building, to resume logging on gentle
slopes, and to remove trees thatwere already cut or
waiting to be extracted by helicopter.
But he upheld the ban on
logging the steepest slopes.
In other words, nothing
changed. That’s what makes this stage of the process almost meaningless.
In such cases, courts will
almost invariable support the status quo. Anything else would pre-judge the
validity of the appeal to the Supreme Court.
But although the immediate
result wa predictable, the
case is being closely watched. Because if the
High stakes
“This
is going to open up a huge can of worms,” said environmental lawyer Andrew
Gage.
That’s what happens when you
have control over the headwaters.
But once water has been
affected—by logging, by agriculture, by recreational use—no amount of treatment
can restore that purity. Treatment plants can, at best, counteract harmful
elements with chemicals and filters. They can no more make water pure again
than a court order can restore virginity.
That’s why municipalities and
forestry companies will continue to watch this case with such interest.
“This is history-setting,”
agreed Sunshine Coast Regional District chair Ed Steeves.
“We’re pioneers here.”
A win for
*****************************************
Copyright © 2007 by Jim Taylor. Non-profit use in congregations and study
groups permitted; all other rights reserved.
*****************************************