|

Sermon by Rev. Wayne Irwin
April 29, 2007
Scripture Reading 1 Peter
1:20-25
Magazine cartoon.
Depicting two persons working side-by-side.
Says the one to the other:
“I used to be an atheist . . .
until I discovered that atheists . . .
don’t have any holidays.”
Meant to be a chuckle
. . . at the expense of atheists.
Presumably a chuckle for theists.
A chuckle at the expense
of people who do not believe in God,
or who refuse to believe in God,
Presumably meant to be enjoyed
by people who do believe in God.
But all of it betraying the temptation,
for people like us who do
believe in God . . .
all of it betraying the
temptation . . .
for us also to believe
that because we believe in
God,
we are therefore . . .
better people.
‘It ain’t necessarily so!
And certainly, because of
Jesus,
we ought to know
that God’s love has nothing
to do
with whether we be theists
or atheists.
Noted mythologist Joseph
Campbell:
Says he: “The only real
difference
between atheists and theists
. . .
is in their description . .
. of their God.”
Even atheists have a
conceptualization of God.
An idea of God that they
reject.
And we, who are believers in
God,
we have an idea of God that
we accept.
And we who are Christian
believers in God,
are actually more . . . than
theists.
Because we have a special
idea of God
that depends on our
understanding of Jesus.
In fact, we who are
Christian believers in God
are much more than simply
believers in the existence
of God.
By choosing to be Christian,
by choosing to be of those
who, as we put it, “walk
with Jesus,”
we show ourselves
to be believers
who have also chosen
to be in relationship with
God.
Or at the very least
in hope of relationship with
God.
Obviously there is a
difference.
Between just believing in
God,
and being in relationship
with God.
In his book entitled
‘Miracles,’
the Irish author and
scholar, C.S.Lewis
uses a word picture about
shellfish
to illustrate why he thinks
so many people
find it difficult
to have any relationship
with God.
In Lewis’ analogy,
this particular shellfish
experiences the presence of
a human being,
and attempts to report to
other shellfish
what has been seen.
In doing so, the shellfish,
of course,
describes the experience
using shellfish concepts,
and thus presents a
description
that in shellfish terms, is
basically negative.
The report states, for
example,
that the human has no shell.
That the human is not
attached to a rock.
That the human is not
surrounded by water.
And since each of these
conditions
is essential for life for a
shellfish,
the report states that the
human
must be a sort of amorphous
jelly,
existing in a dimensionless
void.
And since for the shellfish
the water is what drifts
food into reach,
then the human must never
take nourishment.
And even if the shellfish
believes
that the human exists,
it has no hope of developing
any relationship
Lewis argues that a person
can believe or not believe
in any kind of god,
but that a person cannot
have relationship
with just any kind of god,
nor, therefore, confidence .
. . in just any god.
I remember the first time I
saw Queen Elizabeth.
She was still the Princess.
The year was 1951.
Travelling in place of her
ailing father.
She passed through the
railway station
at the west end of Dundas,
with Prince Philip,
waving to the assembled
crowd
from her viewing place at
the back of the train.
I was seven years old,
and I had been putting
together a scrapbook
of pictures from the
newspaper
of her visit in Canada thus
far.
But now, having seen her in
person,
it became easy for me after
that
to say to myself and to
others
“I believe that Princess
Elizabeth really exists,
because I have seen her.”
She was no longer just a
picture
on the front page of a
newspaper.
She existed as a person.
And I believed in her
existence.
But I had no relationship
with her.
And no expectation of one.
Nor with her son, little
Prince Charles.
We in the church are persons
who believe that God exists.
But we also are persons
who are in some sort of
relationship with God,
some sort of conscious
relationship, that is,
or who are inclined to
establish one,
or who expect to begin one,
and who are intentional
about doing so.
But it takes good
relationship
to inspire confidence.
And just believing in God
inspires nothing.
So there we find a major
difference
between us Christians
and those who are atheists,
between us Christians
and those who are simply
theists,
who are simply believers
in the existence of God. . .
. Relationship.
And subsequent confidence.
Now for a twist. . .
I happen to be a Christian
who believes that God does
not exist!
But I’m not an atheist. How
can that be?
Well, I’m speaking of the
aspect of God
that we traditionally name
as ‘the Father,’ or the
Creator.’
We Christians speak of God
using a Trinitarian formula.
It’s one of our ways of
distinguishing
our God from other gods,
the God revealed in Jesus.
We say, “God, Father, Son
and Holy Spirit.”
Well, I happen to believe
that the ‘Father’
in that triumvirate
does not exist.
Rather I believe that the
‘Father’
actually does something
else.
Something that is above
existence.
Beyond existence.
And before existence.
After all, existence is what
‘the Father’ created.
So God, the Father, does,
whatever ‘the Father’ was
doing
before manifesting within
creation as the Son,
by means of the empowering
of the Holy Spirit.
So, I believe that only an
aspect of God
entered into creation . . .
into existence. . .
the aspect we traditionally
name as ‘ the Son,’
or ‘the Christ.’
That, I believe, is the
aspect of God that exists.
The aspect incarnate in
Jesus.
The aspect incarnate in each
of us.
The aspect of God that
exists within creation.
Empowered within Jesus,
and empowered within us, and
within creation,
by the third aspect of God
that exists –
what we name with the name,
‘the Holy Spirit.’
The Son and the Spirit can
be experienced
within existence.
The Father, the Creator, the
Initiator, cannot.
Now that’s what I believe.
After a lifetime of
reflection.
What you believe is probably
a bit different.
Doesn’t matter.
What’s interesting, though,
to me,
and perhaps to you,
is that the initiating
aspect of God,
which is traditionally
conceptualized as male,
as the “planter of the
seed,” as the ‘Father,’
is surely like unto the
Hindu concept
of Brahma,
the senior member
of the triad of great Hindu
gods.
Brahma, in the Hindu belief
system,
as in that of the Buddha,
is also above and beyond
existence,
beyond contact by mere
mortals
and beyond relationship.
So, whatever our religion,
or our lack of it,
we all have ideas . . . and
concepts . . .
and theologies, and
philosophies . . .
that we either accept,
or that we refuse to accept.
And they inform our
responses
to the experiences of our
lives.
June Callwood, Saint June,
as she was dubbed by The
Globe and Mail,
in her last interview on the
CBC
was asked if she believed in
God.
“No,” she said. “But I
believe in Kindness.”
Well, what’s the difference?
The English word ‘God’
is only a corruption of the
word “Goodness.”
If you believe in Kindness,
odds are you believe in
Goodness.
A person is only an atheist
in terms of the conventional
concepts of God,
in terms of the conventional
ways we have
of describing the
indescribable.
And regardless of what we
accept
or refuse to accept,
all of us are confronted,
nevertheless,
by the Mystery,
by the Unfathomable Mystery
of Life itself,
and of Love,
by the Mystery of Beauty.
The Mystery of Music.
The Mystery of Humour. And
Kindness.
All of us, be we theist or
atheist,
are confronted
by the Unfathomable Unknown
whether we believe in
traditional concepts
or whether we don’t.
But it is those of us who
make the choice
to enter into relationship
with that Mystery,
who make the choice to
embark
upon that adventure,
who discover that it is
actually possible.
And those of us who do so,
who do it by prayer and by
practice,
by talking with Jesus,
by walking with Jesus,
by being a friend to Jesus
and to those whom Jesus
loves,
we are the ones
who find ourselves thereby
enabled
to enter into relationship
with Jesus’ family,
to come to know the
truth about God
and to consequently become
able
to live our lives with
confidence in God.
And our text today, the 21st
verse
in the First Letter of
Peter,
declares this to be the case
for followers of the
so-called ‘Way of Jesus.’
The writer, in the name of
Peter,
says to the readers . . .
says to us:
“Through Christ . . .
you [now] believe in
God . . .
who raised Christ from
death,
and gave him glory,
so that your faith and
hope
would become . . set on
God.”
The New Revised Standard
Version puts it:
“Through Christ . . .
you have now come to
trust in God.”
Peter’s Letter is telling us
that it is the aspect of God
within existence,
namely the Son, namely the
Christ,
who enables us to come into
relationship
with the aspect of God that
is beyond existence,
with the Supreme aspect of
the Godhead.
And so it is Christ, the
Cosmic Christ,
who enables our confidence
in the love and the purposes
of the Great Intention that
initiated all that is.
And this is accomplished by
means of
what is called “the Leap of
Faith.”
Our confidence in God is
enabled
by our leap of faith,
by our intentional putting
of our trust
into living our lives
in the same Spirit that
empowered Jesus,
and in discovering, as did
Jesus,
that in the face of all
evidence to the contrary, God is able to accomplish
whatever God intends to
accomplish.
And God is the only One
who can be utterly trusted.
That’s the whole symbolism
of the Crucifixion
and the Resurrection.
No matter what happens, God
can deal with it.
And the leap of faith
is actually the leap we take
when we come to the limit
of what we humanly know and
understand.
It is the leap we take
from the precipice of our
knowledge
into what we believe to be
the Friendly Mystery of what
is Unknowable.
And our confidence is born
when we stand on that
promontory, as it were,
and leaning past the point
of no return
leap into that abyss,
discovering that somehow we
are enfolded
and kept safe
and lifted up
and set down somewhere
upon firm ground.
And as for those who, today,
say
they do not believe in God,
G.K. Chesteron,
the influential 20th
century English writer
has this to say . . . to
them:
“When you stop believing in
God
you do not then simply begin
believing in nothing.
Rather, you then begin
believing in anything,
and in everything.
You divide up your loyalty.
And you fix some of your
faith
on your finances.
You fix some other of your
faith
on your friends.
“And your fix the rest of
your faith
on your own personal
strengths,
on your wits, and on your
wiles.
But experience teaches
(Chesterton says)
that none of these things
can ultimately inspire . . .
absolute confidence.”
Friends, we are the living
organism
that is Centenary Church
2007.
We are a faith community
committed to walking in the
way of Jesus.
We are presently asking many
questions
about our future.
So, it behoves us to
remember
what we are . . . why we are
. . .
where we are . . . when we
are . . .
who we are . . . and whose
we are,
and whose ministry it is in
which we share.
With all of the cultural and
religious conflict
across the world.
With the lack of
understanding of each other.
With all the talk of climate
change,
its threat and our future
because of it,
with all the controversy
over who’s responsible,
we who have confidence in
God
can actually rest easy.
Because we know this is
God’s world,
not ours.
And that the future of this
world
is in God’s hands, not ours.
That we are privileged with
the responsibility
to care for this world
and have dominion over it.
But that ultimately
what God wants is what God
will get.
And because of Jesus,
we are a faith community
that will maintain
confidence in God.
Hymn Writer Maltbie
Babcock’s words
from the hymn we’ll sing to
close our service:
This is God's wondrous
world:
O let me ne'er
forget
that though the
wrong
seems oft so
strong,
God is the
ruler yet.
This is God's wondrous
world:
why should my heart
be sad?
Let voices sing, let the
heavens ring:
God reigns, let
earth be glad!
Keep your confidence in
God! Amen.
|